Bingo Plus Reward Points Login

Who Will Win the NBA Futures Outright Winner Title This Season?

As I sit here watching the NBA playoffs unfold, I can't help but draw some unexpected parallels between the championship race and my recent experience playing Stalker 2. The game's technical issues—those three frustrating crashes to desktop and those two side quests that kept locking me into endless conversation loops—remind me of how even the most promising NBA teams can hit unexpected roadblocks on their path to the championship. Just like how I had to restart my game multiple times to escape those bugged conversations, NBA teams sometimes need to completely reset their strategies mid-season when things aren't working.

Take the Denver Nuggets, for instance. They looked absolutely dominant last season, much like how Stalker 2 appears incredibly promising at first glance. But then they hit what I'd call their "technical glitches"—injuries to key players that forced them to reload their game plan, just like I had to load earlier saves to bypass those conversation bugs. I've watched them struggle through stretches where their offense would completely freeze up, similar to how my side quests would sometimes block progress entirely. The difference is, while GSC Game World is patching Stalker 2's issues, NBA teams have to patch their problems in real-time during games.

The Boston Celtics present another fascinating case study. They've been building toward this moment for years, assembling what should be a championship-caliber roster. But watching them sometimes feels like playing those side quests where the required items never materialize—the pieces are all there on paper, but the chemistry just doesn't click when it matters most. I've seen them in games where their three-point shooting, which should be their greatest weapon, completely disappears, leaving them scrambling for alternatives. It's frustrating to watch, much like encountering game-breaking bugs that halt your progress entirely.

Then there's the Milwaukee Bucks, who remind me of when I discovered that one of Stalker 2's bugs fixed itself after a patch. The Bucks made that coaching change mid-season, and suddenly things started working differently. Damian Lillard's integration has been patchy at times—some games he looks like the perfect complement to Giannis, other times it's like they're playing different games entirely. I've counted at least 12 games this season where their fourth-quarter execution completely broke down, forcing what felt like a "full restart" of their offensive sets.

What fascinates me about this NBA season is how every contender has their own version of Stalker 2's technical issues. The Phoenix Suns have that incredible offensive firepower that should theoretically overwhelm everyone, but I've watched them struggle with defensive communication breakdowns that remind me of those conversation loops I couldn't escape. There was this one game against Sacramento where they gave up 15 offensive rebounds—that's the basketball equivalent of getting stuck in a dialogue tree you can't exit.

My personal favorite to watch has been the Oklahoma City Thunder, though I'm not convinced they're ready to win it all yet. They're like a beautifully designed game that occasionally crashes because it's trying to do too much too soon. I've tracked their performance in close games—they're 18-9 in games decided by five points or less, which is impressive until you realize they've played more close games than any other contender. That tells me they're good, but not quite dominant enough to avoid those nerve-wracking finishes.

The Western Conference feels particularly stacked this year, with at least five teams that could realistically make the Finals. It's like having multiple game studios all releasing potential Game of the Year contenders simultaneously. The Minnesota Timberwolves' defense has been absolutely stifling—I watched them hold opponents under 100 points in 28 different games this season. But their offense can sometimes resemble those bugged side quests where the objectives don't trigger properly. There were stretches where they'd go multiple possessions without getting a good look, much like how I'd wander around Stalker 2's world waiting for quest items to spawn.

What gives me hope for this NBA season is seeing how teams adapt to their challenges, similar to how game developers address technical issues. The Dallas Mavericks made those mid-season trades that completely transformed their defensive capabilities—it was like downloading a crucial patch that fixed their most glaring weaknesses. I've noticed their defensive rating improved from 112.3 before the trade deadline to 108.9 after, which is a significant jump that could make them dangerous in the playoffs.

As we head toward the finals, I'm keeping my eye on which team can avoid those "crash to desktop" moments—the complete offensive breakdowns or defensive lapses that cost you playoff games. Having watched basketball for over twenty years, I've learned that championships are often won by the team that experiences the fewest catastrophic failures at the worst possible moments. The team that can navigate through the bugs in their system, so to speak, will likely be the one holding the Larry O'Brien trophy in June. Based on what I've seen, I'm leaning toward the Nuggets repeating, but I wouldn't be surprised if the Celtics finally break through—provided they can fix their own version of those conversation loops that kept trapping me in Stalker 2.

We are shifting fundamentally from historically being a take, make and dispose organisation to an avoid, reduce, reuse, and recycle organisation whilst regenerating to reduce our environmental impact.  We see significant potential in this space for our operations and for our industry, not only to reduce waste and improve resource use efficiency, but to transform our view of the finite resources in our care.

Looking to the Future

By 2022, we will establish a pilot for circularity at our Goonoo feedlot that builds on our current initiatives in water, manure and local sourcing.  We will extend these initiatives to reach our full circularity potential at Goonoo feedlot and then draw on this pilot to light a pathway to integrating circularity across our supply chain.

The quality of our product and ongoing health of our business is intrinsically linked to healthy and functioning ecosystems.  We recognise our potential to play our part in reversing the decline in biodiversity, building soil health and protecting key ecosystems in our care.  This theme extends on the core initiatives and practices already embedded in our business including our sustainable stocking strategy and our long-standing best practice Rangelands Management program, to a more a holistic approach to our landscape.

We are the custodians of a significant natural asset that extends across 6.4 million hectares in some of the most remote parts of Australia.  Building a strong foundation of condition assessment will be fundamental to mapping out a successful pathway to improving the health of the landscape and to drive growth in the value of our Natural Capital.

Our Commitment

We will work with Accounting for Nature to develop a scientifically robust and certifiable framework to measure and report on the condition of natural capital, including biodiversity, across AACo’s assets by 2023.  We will apply that framework to baseline priority assets by 2024.

Looking to the Future

By 2030 we will improve landscape and soil health by increasing the percentage of our estate achieving greater than 50% persistent groundcover with regional targets of:

– Savannah and Tropics – 90% of land achieving >50% cover

– Sub-tropics – 80% of land achieving >50% perennial cover

– Grasslands – 80% of land achieving >50% cover

– Desert country – 60% of land achieving >50% cover